GOODBYE TO DOUBLE JEOPARDY
The Fifth Amendment lay
in tatters on the courtroom floor
For hundreds of
years the American people have been led to believe that they could not be
charged, tried and or convicted of the same crime twice. The portion of the very amendment which used to protect us reads, "No person shall . . . be subject for the same offense to be
twice put in jeopardy of life or limb . . . ." Today that portion, along with equally large
portions of the First, Second, and Fourth Amendments has been trampled under
the feet of the usurpers of freedom through federal overreach and totalitarian prosecution.
Here’s one of many
examples, [examples so numerous as to be practically
uncountable] of a violation of one’s Fifth Amendment rights. I'm sure you remember the George Floyd
debacle in all its high definition television coverage. Right … the one in which a physically
imposing and Violent American Black [VAB] multiple-offender [known to be in possession of a deadly weapon] died
while in the custody of 4 police officers whose combined weight barely
overshadowed that of Floyd. They did
their best to subdue this ferocious large felon while executing an arrest for
yet another of the litany of crimes adorning his jail cell walls.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Floyd's death gave the feds needed 'leverage'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Floyd died, and the death of any human is a tragedy, but his
signaled one more early step in the criminal progression of the erosion of the
Fifth Amendment’s protection from double-jeopardy. The police officers involved were tried in the
racially charged and overtly biased setting of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Typically
'Wigger' judges refused requests for a change of venue, assuring conviction of
the police officers involved.
In the limelight
of nationwide press, witness after witness bore their souls as to the horrific
treatment poor George Floyd had been
subjected to before his untimely demise under the restraining knee of a police
officer on the streets of Minneapolis, Minnesota. It
was all a well scripted soap opera with insidious intent.
Rightfully or
wrongfully, the police officers involved were convicted of felony
behaviour. Okay, the state of Minnesota tried, convicted, and sentenced these
men. You’d think it was over … it should
have been over ... and you’d be wrong.
As long as Washington, D.C. is open for business “it
ain’t over til’ it’s over.”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dictators pursue 'eternal prosecution'.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the feds this
just wasn’t enough. Black and ‘Wigger’ [Wiggers are
those Caucasians, Latinos, and Asians who are dreadfully ashamed of their race
and bend over backward to keep ‘Whitey’ down] alike had taken
to the streets smashing, looting, burning, and trying to kill ‘Whitey.
Woe betides anyone
who stood in the path of black racist supremacy. Black supremacists such as BLM, Antifa,
NAACP, SCLC and a host of others were on the march and stood ready to ‘burn the country down’ if the law didn’t lock
these cops up ‘forever’, according to LaDandre
DeShaun Brown, a local Minnesota activist.
HERE
WE GO ... ENTER THE FEDS:
Eager to defuse the situation, federal prosecutors decided to try the
men again. They would extend sentences
imposed in their existing trial and conviction through parallel repetition of
the judicial process. But wait a minute … the men had already been tried,
convicted, and even sentenced! One
would think that, according to the Constitution of the United States, it was all over [unless the convictions went to appeal] and this was
it!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prosecutors use 'parallel prosecution'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope! The
Feds, as they have so often done in recent decades, simply re-labeled
the crime and gave it a new and nebulous name, “Violation
of Civil Rights”. With a
newly labeled crime and existing‘Hate Crime’ statutes in hand they were off and running.
Remember that federal
prosecutors [due to a bottomless budget and a blank
checkbook] enjoy a conviction rate of 94% which is significantly
higher than any of the states that make up our fractured union. This would be a ‘cake
walk’ for the feds because, on top of every other factor, George
Floyd also enjoyed ‘protected class’ status
because of the colour of his skin. Yes,
the feds would have a field day as they played the ‘Race
Card’, shouted ‘Hate Crime’,
and retried these men under a new name.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Same crime + different name = new crime
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re-labeling the
same criminal event for the purpose of re-prosecution is unconscionable yet it
has never been addressed by the US Supreme Court. It would seem the
Supreme Court is complicit in the deliberate degradation of our civil rights. The ability to re-label a crime gives an already
omnipotent federal government the ability to hound, arrest, arraign, and try
anyone they don’t like and to keep it up until they finally get lucky and slam
someone in prison or have them killed.
We
must rise up and put this to rest. By
use of our shattered electoral and judicial systems we must regain control of
our country. We must rebuild the
Constitution of the United States, repairing the cracks and tears
within. Only through this course can we
avoid the bloodshed which is otherwise a foregone conclusion.
It’s tragic at best and evil at worst. I’m Max, and that’s the way I see it!
